Page 28 - Knowledge Network Transform
P. 28

Search  under  GST,  sans  the  procedures  under       ii  he should record in writing the grounds of his
         Cr.P.C.  are  being  followed  shall  be  illegal:  As     belief  and  specify  in  such  writing  as  far  as
         mentioned  herein  above,  the  provisions  of  the       possible the things for which the search is to be
         Code  of  Criminal  Procedure,  1973,  relating  to       made;
         search and seizure, shall, so far as may be, apply to   iii  he must conduct the search, if practicable, in
         search and seizure under GST also. The Supreme            person; and
         Court, in State of Rajasthan v. Rehman, 1978 (2)
         E.L.T. 294 (S.C.); (1960) 1 SCR 991 while examining     iv  if  it  is  not  practicable  to  make  the  search
         the  search  under  Central  Excise,  wherein  also       himself, he must record in writing the reasons
                                                                   for not himself making the search and shall
         provision of Cr.P.C. has been made applicable to
                                                                   authorise a subordinate officer to make the
         the search carried out under the Central Excise,
         the Supreme Court held that “9…the search made            search after specifying in writing the place to
         by the Deputy Superintendent in the present case          be searched, and, so far as possible, the thing
                                                                   for which search is to be made. Thus, search
         in contravention of the provisions of Section 165
                                                                   under  GST  also,  sans  the  procedures  under
         of the Code was illegal” The Supreme Court in this
         held that “8.  There are no merits in the second          Cr.P.C.  are  being  followed  shall  be  illegal.
                                                                   Similarly, in the case of State of U.P. v Lavkush
         contention either. The recording of reasons does
                                                                   Kumar and Others 1986 (26) E.L.T. 922 (All.), it
         not confer on the officer jurisdiction to make a
                                                                   is held that “16.
         search,  though  it  is  a  necessary  condition  for
         making a search. The jurisdiction of the power to       Moreover, S. 165, Cr. P.C. which section would be
         make a search is conferred by the statute and not       applicable to the search and seizure made by the
         derived from the record of reasons.                     Inspector of Central Excise, provides that if delay
                                                                 in effecting the search is to be avoided, then the
         That apart, Section 18 of the Act in express terms
                                                                 officer  undertaking  the  search  has  to  pre-
         states  that  searches  shall  be  carried  out  in
         accordance  with  the  provisions  of  the  Code  of    record in writing the grounds of his belief that
         Criminal Procedure. Section 165 of the Code lays        the  thing  required  to  be  obtained  through
                                                                 search  would  not  be  obtainable  without
         down  various  steps  to  be  followed  in  making  a
                                                                 undue delay and has to specify in such writing t
         search. The recording of reasons is an important
         step in the matter of search and to ignore it is to     he  thing  for  which  search  is  to  be  made.  The
         ignore the material part of the provisions governing    provisions of S. 165, Cr. P.C. are mandatory.
         searches. If that can be ignored, if cannot be said     Their  non-compliance  renders  his  action  of
         that the search is carried out in accordance with the   carrying out search illegal.” The Supreme Court
         provisions  of  the  Code  of  Criminal  Procedure;  it   while  dealing  with  matter  relating  to  search
         would be a search made in contravention of the          under Sales Tax, in Commissioner of Commercial
         provisions of the Code.” It is important to note the    Taxes  ...  vs  Ramkishan  Shrikishan  Jhaver  And
         while elaborating on the provisions of search under     reported  in  AIR  1968  SC  59,  about  the
         section  165  of  the  Cr.P.C.,  noted  the  conditions   applicability of provisions of search under Cr.P.C.
         imposed for carrying out the search.                    to search under sales tax has observed that “17..
                                                                 The proviso clearly lays down that all searches
         Under Section 165, four conditions are imposed :
                                                                 made under this sub-section, so far as may be,
         i   the police officer must have reasonable ground
                                                                 shall be made in accordance with the provisions
           for believing that anything necessary for the
                                                                 of  the  Code  of  Criminal  Procedure.  Thus  all
           purpose  of  an  investigation  of  an  offence
           cannot, in his opinion, be obtained otherwise         provisions  contained  in  the  Code  of  Criminal
                                                                 Procedure  relating  to  searches  would  be
           than by making search, without undue delay;
                                                                 applicable to searches under sub-section (2), so
           25                                The healthiest response to life is joy.
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33