Page 36 - Knowledge Network Transform
P. 36

bow down to the parent statute. This proposition        application  of  mind  by  the  authority  prior  to
         has been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in         reopening  is  must.  Escapement  of  income  is
         the case of  UOI &Anr v. Intercontinental Consultants   required and reopening shall not be permitted to
         and Technocrats Private Limited (2018) 4 SCC 669,       make  general/roving  enquiry.  Any  vague  or
         Nova  Ads  v.  Metropolitan  Transport  Corporation     incorrect  information  cannot  form  basis  for
         &Ors (2015) 13 SCC 257, and Babaji Kondaji Garad v.     reopening  the  assessment  for  making  roving
         Nashik  Merchants  Co-operative  Bank  Ltd.,  Nashik    enquiry The authority shall look into the information
         &Ors AIR 1984 SC 192.                                   and make inquiry and seek reply from the assessee
         Therefore,  CBDT  Circulars,  Notifications  and        before issuing notice under 148 of the Act. Power of
         Instructions     cannot conflict with the Income-tax    review  shall  not  be  available  with  the  authority.
         Act, 1961. The Parent statute i.e., Income-tax Act,     While drafting reply to notice 148A(b) of the Act
         1961  will  prevail  over  such  CBDT  Circulars,       assessee  should  seek  whatever  clarification  or
         Notifications and Instructions.                         details they require in regards to the information
         As per the Supreme Court decision the defence of        and simultaneously file detail reply along with all
         limitation u/s 149 is available to the Assessee. As far   possible  evidence  and  documents  to  refute  any
         as A.Y. 2013 - 2014 is concerned the last day for issue   alleged   facts stated in the information.
         of Notice u/s 148 is. 31.03.2020. Now by virtue of      The authority has to pass a Speaking order under
         first proviso to Section 149 of the Act the reopening   section 148A(d) of the Act. In case proceeding u/s.
         is time barred. The proviso reads as under              148A of the Act are stayed, the period of limitation
         “Provided that no notice under section 148 shall be     for  issuance  of  the  notice  u/s  148,  would  be
         issued  at  any  time  in  a  case  for  the  relevant   extended by 7 days if the available time limit is of
         assessment year beginning on or before 1st day of       less than 7 days. Once the reassessment proceeding
         April, 2021, if a notice under section 148 or section   u/s.  147  of  the  Act  is  initiated  and  subsequently
         153A or section 153C could not have been issued at      some  issue  has  been  noticed  by  the  Assessing
         that time on account of being beyond the time limit     Officer, for that subsequent issue, no requirement
         specified under the provisions of clause (b) of sub-    to  comply  with  the  provision  of  section
         section (1) of this section or section 153A or section   148.Procedure under section 148A of the Act shall
         153C, as the case may be, as they stood immediately     not  be  applicable  in  case  of  search,  survey  or
         before  the  commencement  of  the  Finance  Act,       requisition cases initiated or made or conducted
         2021”                                                   Before  such  assessment  or  re-assessment  or  re-
         The Hon. Gujarat High Court in Keenara Industries       computation commences, a notice is required to be
         Private Ltd v. ITO (2023) 147 taxmann.com 585 (Guj)     issued under section 148A of the Act, which can be
         (HC) and Allahabad High court Rajeev Bansal v. UOI      issued  only  when  there  is  information  with  the
         (2023) 147 taxmann.com 549 (All) (HC) has held that     Assessing Officer which suggests that the income
         Notice u/s 148 issued after 31/3/2021, TOLA will not    chargeable to tax has  escaped assessment in the
         apply. SLP are filed before Supreme court                     case  of  the  assessee  for  the  relevant
         notice  are  issued  to  the  parties  ,                       assessment year.
         therefore one have to wait to see the                            Thus  for  valid  initiation  of  reassessment
         final fate of these limitation issues                            proceedings under sections 147 to 151 of
         before Supreme court.
                                                                          the Act, the following jurisdictional pre-
                                                                           conditions needs to be satisfied.
         Scope and application of New                                       i. That the assessing officer should have
         provision for reassessment:
                                                                            information  which  suggests  that
         13. On reading of the provision                                    assessee's income chargeable to tax has
         it is clear that requirement of                                     escaped  assessment.  The  said




           33          Keep smiling, because life is a beautiful thing and there’s so much to smile about.
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41